★ Should this be a person or an agent?
AI Agent vs Hire Calculator
Compare the fully loaded cost of people doing a task with an AI agent doing it, including the human review it still needs, the build cost and the payback period.
- Runs in your browser
- No signup
Presets are starting assumptions for a small team, not industry statistics. Change every number to match your reality.
The agent saves
$5,812 / month
Pays back the build cost in 2.6 months.
People only
$11.1K/mo
With agent
$5.3K/mo
Hours freed
152 h/mo
12 months, side by side
Cumulative cost. The agent line starts at the build cost.
| Month | People only | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | $0 | $15K |
| 1 | $11.1K | $20.3K |
| 2 | $22.2K | $25.6K |
| 3 | $33.3K | $30.9K |
| 4 | $44.4K | $36.2K |
| 5 | $55.6K | $41.5K |
| 6 | $66.7K | $46.8K |
| 7 | $77.8K | $52.1K |
| 8 | $88.9K | $57.4K |
| 9 | $100K | $62.7K |
| 10 | $111.1K | $68K |
| 11 | $122.2K | $73.3K |
| 12 | $133.3K | $78.6K |
Where the agent cost goes
- Work people still do$4,444
- Reviewing the agent$333
- Model usage$22
- Maintenance$500
Model cost per task: $0.0180 on Claude Sonnet 5.5, for 1,200 agent tasks a month.
An agent that pays back in 2.6 months.
I build production AI agents with human review, guardrails and logging.
How the comparison works
The calculator compares two ways of getting the same tasks done each month: people doing all of them, or an agent doing a share while people do the rest and review the agent's work.
people only = tasks × minutes ÷ 60 × hourly cost
with agent = remaining human work + review time + model cost + maintenance
model cost = agent tasks × (input tokens × input price + output tokens × output price)
savings = people only − with agent
payback = build cost ÷ savings (never, if savings ≤ 0)
It only counts the share of someone's time spent on these tasks, so it answers “what does this work cost”, not “can I remove a job”. Model prices come from the LLM API Cost Calculator.
Worked example
The support agent preset with the example salary of $60,000 plus 25% overhead, 2,000 tickets a month at 8 minutes each, the agent handling 60% and a person reviewing 20% of those:
| Line | Per month |
|---|---|
| People only | $11,111 |
| Remaining human work | $4,444 |
| Reviewing the agent | $333 |
| Model usage (Claude Sonnet 5.5) | $22 |
| Maintenance | $500 |
| With the agent | $5,299 |
| Saving | $5,812 |
With a $15,000 example build cost, payback is 2.6 months. Notice how small the model cost is next to the human time that remains: review time and the share the agent can't finish usually decide the answer, not token prices.
The costs people forget
Review
Someone has to check the agent's work, at least at first. If review takes as long as doing the task, there is no saving.
Evals
A test set of real tasks with known answers, run on every prompt or model change. Without it, every update is a gamble.
Maintenance
APIs change, models get updated, edge cases appear. Budget monthly time to keep the agent working.
Edge cases
The last 20% of tasks are where agents fail loudly. Decide in advance how they reach a person.
When to hire a person instead
- The volume is low. A few hundred tasks a month rarely justifies building and maintaining an agent.
- The work is mostly judgement, relationships or negotiation, with little repetition.
- A single mistake is expensive, legally risky or hard to undo, so review would be close to 100%.
- The process isn't written down yet. Automating an unclear process makes it fail faster.
- You need someone who will improve the process, not just run it.
Questions founders actually ask
Is an AI agent cheaper than hiring someone?
Where do the model prices come from?
Why do the defaults say 'example, replace with yours'?
How do I find the real share of tasks an agent can handle?
Does this include the cost of building evals and guardrails?
Compare by role
More from the workbench
Fine print
Tools: on the house.
Engineer: by the hour.
The math was free. A reliable agent takes engineering, which is what I do.
I'm Himanshu, an AI and full-stack engineer. I build MVPs, AI agents and the growth plumbing around them for early-stage startups.
